lasthigh

Then why your angry outburst It’s not an angry outburst, it’s an observation on the state of affairs. Over the years Kalki has been associated with issues related to women’s empowerment that she raises in cinema, in videos and on public platforms.What brought about The Printing Machine I was just disturbed by headlines and wanted to write how we become desensitised to shocking news.

How tough was it for you to put your thoughts and words across in a coherent flow despite the anger I think I enjoy the process of putting words to rhyme and rhythm—it’s the performer in me. The excesses of the media have been excessively covered.How did the words come to you Just kept hitting headlines or thoughts down over a couple of months and then when I got the sound of the printing machine takakataka— that’s when I turned it into a poem. If Nirbhaya was not highlighted to a hammering high, we would have never made rape an issue for discussion Do you agree Oh absolutely. Kalki Koechlin Kalki Koechlin’s bright and provocative video The Printing Machine features the feisty actress in an aggressive avatar, deriding the role of the media in sensationalizing news about women.There is a mix of truth and anger in your diatribe. It was written in Jan 2015. The idea is not that shocking journalism should be censored, but that it should be followed through and not given in snippets without context, and that our recent past should not be forgotten quickly.

Kalki Koechlin’s bright and provocative video The Printing Machine features the feisty actress in PVC injection molding machine Manufacturers an aggressive avatar, deriding the role of the media in sensationalizing news about women.What plans for 2016 Lots of releases hopefully. A chat with the spirited activist-actress. Jia Aur Jia with Richa Chadha and me is also finally set to release this year. Is that what you aimed to project I aim to make us aware of our habits and trappings as a society to be apathetic.Please tell us about your forthcoming films Death on the Gung, set in 1970s where I play a girl called Mimi, a writer and a woman of 34

 It would defeat the entire purpose of Rahul Gandhi’s effort if just an interim arrangement is made by appointing a loyal veteran as party president and then the arrangement is allowed to continue indefinitely. Till a new leader emerges on the horizon, Rahul Gandhi remains the primary vote catcher of the party and he must be utilised to lead the Opposition in Parliament and the campaign among people.

In coming weeks, expect more leaders with little commitment, save to themselves, crossing over to the BJP. Secondly, and this stems from the first point, use of a tactic to get some of these party veterans to step down is proof that despite having been Congress president since December 2017, Rahul Gandhis writ did not run in the party as forcefully as his mother’s did when she was party chief.The 2019 Lok Sabha election is not the first instance of the Congress Party being pushed into a crisis.Sonia Gandhi, back then, did not accept responsibility for the defeat despite the universal law of accountability beginning at the top. Of varying severities, the party was previously confronted with post-poll challenges, unprecedented on each occasion, in 1967, 1977, 1989, 1996, 1999 and 2014.Rahul Gandhi has to ensure that the new leader of the party is never seen as a modern day "Bharat" who is keeping the seat warm for the eventual return of "Ram". Instead, the president formed a four-member committee headed by A.

Not just the Gandhis and the Congress party, but even the country requires a "new look" in the organisation which can no longer bask in the glory of its past. Despite opposition from sections of old-timers, the process for electing a new president must be set in motion. First, Rahul Gandhi’s was essentially a ploy to force other leaders, especially some of the veterans —two of them, Kamal Nath and Ashok Gehlot, were reportedly mentioned by him at a party meeting — to also accept their share of responsibility and step down from their offices.In almost another 10 days it will be two months since Rahul Gandhi resigned as party president and unless his colleagues get together to evolve a different arrangement, it will soon be 20 months and there may be little left for the party to consolidate. Neither did the Congress president, Sonia Gandhi take its blame, nor did Manmohan Singh, who was Prime Minister.

This provides the Congress with the opportunity to separate the position of the party president from its legislative head. The report was finalised in a few months and targeted everything from infighting, demoralisation of workers, lack of effective pre-poll alliances, corruption and communal polarisation.Having said that his decision to resign was democratic, it also reveals two other sets of reality. None of them — Sonia, Rahul or Priyanka Gandhi Vadra — can be seen as the first among equals. The process for creating a new structure in the Congress must begin post-haste and new leaders must move into leadership positions. Despite this, Rahul Gandhi was not exactly a pushover as an Opposition leader and Mr Modi’s exertions against the Congress president was testimony to this till the post-Pulwama/Balakot events altered the poll narrative. After all, if there is no Opposition, India will stop being a democracy. The two of them were jointly responsible for frittering away the gains of 2009 when the Congress became the first party since 1991 to win more than 200 seats in Lok Sabha. In contrast, Rahul Gandhi has acted bravely and as per the democratic tradition of the leader taking the blame for failure, quit as party president. He must ensure that the new chief has complete independence and authority while adhering to democratic principles of functioning. While crises in previous years can be left for later evaluation, the tight spot the party found itself after the 2014 polls and developments within the party after that defeat must be recalled amid abundance of opinion that the Congress is heading for a meltdown. However, it made no reference to the leadership’s inability or failure to target these shortcomings.K. On the face of this, this may be a difficult task given the fact that Rahul Gandhi or the others in the family still have comparatively greater popularity among people than other leaders. Crucial to this would be the position of the "three Gandhis" under the new chief. Antony and comprising loyalists to review the partys loss. Given this backdrop, he had little option but to either trigger an upheaval within the party or allow matters to be brushed beneath the carpet again. Without doubt, Rahul chose the first option in the hope that uncertainty for the moment, even lasting several months, will be beneficial in the long run.To get a perspective on the Congress leaderships response then and now, it is important to recall events after the 2014 debacle. Already, the malady of plastic injection molding machine greed for power is propelling desertions from the party in Karnataka and Goa. The party has got an opportunity to achieve what was originally intended: that the party president should not be the Prime Minister when the party is in power and must not be the leader of the party’s legislature party when in opposition. In fact, the Congress has a great opportunity to display inner-party democracy at a time when its primary rival, the BJP, has increasingly become a collective of a few. It must be kept in mind that Rahul Gandhi faced a bigger challenge than his mother because Prime Minister Narendra Modi contested the election with the advantage of the entire state machinery backing every action of his, sometimes in a grossly unfair manner. The selection process must be transparent and take away the charge of the Congress being a dynastic party run on undemocratic lines.

The best way to understand the RSS, he said, would be by attending shakhas and becoming its karyakartas. In his summation speech, Bhagwat thanked the audience for having listened to him over three days. The first way is by exploring the question of the purpose or the objective behind holding the programme, and that too in the centre of the Indian capital at a venue where the tallest of global leaders have rubbed shoulders. The other framework for analysing the lecture series would be to peruse what has been said. But Bhagwat’s certificate of good conduct will not prevent rampaging fringe forces who move through the stealth of the night and in open daylight, with no fear of any sarkari tantra or official machinery preventing attacks on Muslims on meagre suspicion of acing like bad Muslims who indulge in anti-Hindu practices and habits. He also used phraseology in complete contrast to what is practised by swayamsevaks on the ground. Bhagwat’s lectures should be seen as a part of this attempt and proves that once against the parivar remains united and committed to try securing another spectacular victory for the BJP. After four years of none too impressive governance, and with victory not a certainty at this point of time, the Sangh Parivar once again feels the need to regain Middle India, which has somewhat drifted away.

 Bhagwat’s depiction of Muslims as being an integral part of Hindu society because "their ancestors were the same as ours" is what lays ground for reverse conversion programmes like ghar wapasi. The Sangh Parivar has contended for long that if Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists can be called Hindus, then why not Muslims and Christians too? In 1993, a while after the demolition of the Babri Masjid, Organiser, the RSS’ weekly official organ, published an article pleading for renaming India..The sarsanghchalak of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, Mohan Bhagwat, let the cat out of the bag at the end of his first-ever lecture series on the "Bharat of Future", in which there was little futuristic vision and more of the past and present. This was the first time that the RSS did not shy away from meeting criticism in all civility, but on a platform where Bhagwat was carefully shielded from any awkwardness.There are two prisms through which one can view the RSS’ most concerted bid at public relations. But he added that if they, and others watching on their televisions, computers and mobiles, diغير مجاز مي باشدreed with the RSS, they must come closer and engage with the organisation instead of forming opinions based on the comments of its adversaries.Bhagwat has taken a leaf out of the BJP book and resorted to slogan-speak to ensure that his Q&A session was met with applause. From the limited perspective of the objective behind the programme, it has been somewhat fulfilled because the sarsanghchalak provided an argumentative framework to the already half-committed to the Sangh but who did not have the gumption to go the whole hog. This was a programme where there was no scope for scrutiny, much less cross-examination. It is presented as way of life and the RSS argues contentiously that one can be a Hindu while remaining a follower of Islam and Christianity.

After discussing several possibilities like Hindustan and Bharat, these were rejected — the first for "too many stans" being "around us" and the second because if Bharat was the nation’s name and Bharatiya the nationality, it would "resemble a surname". The RSS has always tried to present Hinduism as being more than a religion. Although the Q&A session would be cited as evidence of the RSS being democratic and not scared of uncomfortable questions, the world knows how written questions submitted in advance are selectively taken up. Importantly, the Sangh has a humongous army of unaccountables, those who like Nathuram Godse, serve the purpose of the organisation without burdening it with any responsibility. Yet, Bhagwat has chosen his words carefully, camouflaging them in niceties to make it palatable to people in the middle who always wanted to side with the Sangh Parivar but were short of political courage. But, it has been added that they must accept the ideas and ideals of Hindus as their own because it was not religion but the culture of the nation. To buttress their point, they cite Article 25(2b) of the Constitution, which specifies that the "reference to Hindus shall be construed as including a reference to persons professing the Sikh, Jain or Buddhist religion, and the reference to Hindu religious institutions shall be construed accordingly". And it will be a while before, if ever it does, reports of people submitting tough queries which were not taken up start surfacing. Effectively, Bhagwat’s programme was a membership drive in another name and open only to men because women cannot become members of the RSS. It has been argued previously that the Sangh Parivar and its leaders have "no problems" with Muslims following their own faith. Bhagwat may have said all the nice things about the good Muslim who is willing to embrace Bhartiyata or Indianness, and this may provide the fig leaf to those wanting to غير مجاز مي باشدy up with the saffron brotherhood. Like always, cliché was the entry point for the organisation which has picked up a leaf from its most successful pupil on how to plan and conduct an event. The "best option" was to rename India as Hindudesh because "our nationality will be Hindu", and whether Muslims like it or not, when they go for Haj, they will go as Hindus, stamped on their passports!In 2014, the BJP won the Lok Sabha double color injection molding machine Manufacturers election primarily because Middle India rooted for the party after concluding that it had shed the communal prejudice towards minorities of the past